"I'll be more supportive when they start removing pedophiles from the priesthood."
- George Carlin

"Sin has to be a grievous offense, sufficient reflection, and full consent of the will."
- The Church's view on sin

"1. The condition of being unmarried, esp. by reason of religious vows. 2. Abstinence from sexual intercourse."
- Webster's definition of Celibacy

"1. The state or quality of being chaste or pure. 2. a. Virginity. b. Virtuousness. c. Celibacy."
- Webster's definition of Chastity

"I just knew it would be the Catholics."
- Serendipity (Salma Hayek) from the movie, Dogma, about the finding the loophole that would erase all of existence. Contradicting that God is infallible.

"Religion should be a celebration. You, Catholics, mourn it. "
- Serendipity (Salma Hayek) from the movie, Dogma, to the last Zion.

"I wasn't too worried about people who were making judgments about the film as Catholic-bashing and they weren't happy about that, because those people weren't going to go to the movie anyway. What I was worried about was the section of the audience that hears the movie is Catholic-bashing and can't wait to see it because they're looking for that movie with teeth and they get in there and watch and they find out it's just a fun film."
- Kevin Smith on his movie, Dogma

"Every dogma has its day."
- Abraham Rotstein

April 26th, 2002

A WORD OF WARNING: IF YOU ARE A DEVOUT CATHOLIC AND ARE SENSITIVE ABOUT THE STANCE THE CHURCH HAS TAKEN ON SEXUAL ABUSE IN THE CATHOLIC PRIESTHOOD, YOU MAY NOT WANT TO READ THIS. YOU WILL BE OFFENDED.

That being said, let the carnage begin.

Can you believe it? The Catholic Church has decided to alienate not only the women of its congregation but also the children as well. Kids, you should now know you are not safe as an altar boy, and you may be a little more hesitant about going on Catholic Retreats, CYO, Lock-Up, or anything involving a priest and a boy (or girl for that matter).

There is a major "crisis" in the Catholic Church.

Let us look at what the Catholic Church is NOT doing for their congregation.

  • The Pope and the US Cardinals have DECLINED the ZERO-TOLERANCE policy.
  • A priest who has committed sexual abuse to kids can still go on being a priest. The church will not take any action unless he is a SERIAL sex abuser. (The first one is on the house after that, boy, you're in trouble.)
  • The Cardinals define what a child is. If you are under twelve, you are a child and qualify as being a sexually abused child. If you are twelve or over, you were probably asking for it, because in the Church's eyes you are an adult and can take care of yourself.
  • They have taken the original definition of celibacy, meaning that the vow is to remain unmarried. The vow to pay attention to is the vow of chastity.
  • The cardinals say, "Even if the cases of true pedophilia on the part of priests and religious are few, all the participants recognized the gravity of the problem. In the meeting, the quantitative terms of the problem were discussed, since the statistics are not very clear in this regard. Attention was drawn to the fact that almost all the cases involved adolescents and therefore were not cases of true pedophilia."
  • The cardinals also say, "Given the doctrinal issues underlying the deplorable behavior in question, certain lines of response have been proposed:
    1. The pastors of the church need clearly to promote the correct moral teaching of the church and publicly to reprimand individuals who spread dissent and groups which advance ambiguous approaches to pastoral care.
    2. A new and serious apostolic visitation of seminaries and other institutes of formation must be made without delay, with particular emphasis on the need for fidelity to the church's teaching, especially in the area of morality, and the need for a deeper study of the criteria of suitability of candidates to the priesthood.
    3. It would be fitting for the Bishops of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops to ask the faithful to join them in observing a national day of prayer and penance, in reparation for the offenses perpetrated and in prayer to God for the conversion of sinners and the reconciliation of victims."

So, what have we learned. That breaks in the vows of celibacy and chastity are not really grounds for a priest to be defrocked. And if we really, really, really, really, really, pray for this problem to go away. It will. Also, that it's not the clergy's fault, it's ours. So, beg for forgiveness.

I'm not going to lie to anyone. I stopped being a practicing Catholic shortly after college. I have to say after college because I went to a Jesuit school and mass was a regular sort of thing there. (I even read a book by Thomas Merton about monastasism.) But even before I went to college, I had never believed in the Catholic Church. It seemed so contra to everything that Jesus said in the Bible.

I've always believed that religion is between the individual and God. No middle man.

The Catholic Church has done so much to discourage people from joining the flock, how can anyone take them seriously. This is not a product of modern thinking. I think you could probably trace this all the way back to St. Paul (I use the term "saint" loosely, having an apparent misogynist as a saint helps me to accentuate the "T" when I spit his name.) Let's take a look at St. Paul, shall we?

For most of his life Paul (AKA - Saul) was a murdering soldier from Damascus. He hated women. Paul was “educated strictly according to the law of our fathers” at the rabbinical school conducted in Jerusalem by the great rabbi Gamaliel (Acts 22:3). Gamaliel was a Pharisee and a member of the Sanhedrin, “a teacher of the law respected by all the people” (Acts 5:34). Although Gamaliel is depicted in the New Testament as lenient towards Christians (Acts 5:33-39), his disciple Saul was active in the earliest persecutions of Christianity and attended the stoning of St. Stephen the deacon and first Christian martyr (Acts 7:58). Paul “persecuted this Way to the death, binding and delivering to prison both men and women” (Acts 22:4). Intent on exterminating the new faith, Paul sought to travel to Damascus to undertake the persecution of Christians there. It was during his trip from Jerusalem to Damascus in Syria that his life would take a crucial turn when he encountered the risen Jesus in a searing vision of light that left him temporarily blind. This experience was revolutionary, engendering a complete transformation and redirection of his life. He was thrown from his horse and saw Jesus in a vision, telling him to give up the sword and follow the Lord. Three years after his conversion, Paul journeyed to Jerusalem to meet with Peter and stayed with him for fifteen days. “But I did not see any other apostle except James, the Lord’s brother” (Galatians 1:18-19). In Acts 9:26-30 Luke describes the suspicion with which the leaders of the Church in Jerusalem greeted Paul and that it was Barnabas who secured Paul’s acceptance. From Jerusalem, Paul returned to Syria and ultimately went to its capital, Antioch, the third city in the empire after Rome itself and Alexandria in Egypt.

Eusebius, the 4th century bishop of Caesarea who is often called the first Church historian, records that the apostle Paul was executed in Rome during the persecution of the emperor and madman, Nero. Nero’s persecution of Christians lasted for four years, from 64 to 68AD. It was also during this persecution that the apostle Peter was executed. As a Roman citizen entitled to a quick death, Paul was beheaded. St. Gregory the Great, the 6th century pope, wrote that Paul’s execution took place on the left bank of the Tiber River on the Via Ostiensis, the road to the port of Ostia, and is buried near the site of the basilica of St. Paul Outside the Walls.

That's the story of Paul. To get a real feel for his idiocy, which I'm certain was from the head injury he got from the horse fall, you should read his Letters to the Corinthians. He taught what he knew. Not what he was "inspired" to know. He excluded half of the human race from his congregation (for being female). I can't find any documentation to say he was behind the concept of celibacy, but I'm pretty sure he would be. Let's remember, most of the original apostles were married. Mary Magdelene was with the original 12 almost all of the time. And she got the word of God from the source.

Also, if I told people that I fell off a horse, went blind and said I saw Jesus (after he had died), they'd either take me to a hospital for a concussion or put me away in an insane asylum. I like the view of Paul as given in THE LAST TEMPTATION OF CHRIST (Another film that the Catholic Church has banned along with MONTY PYTHON'S LIFE OF BRIAN and THE EXORCIST). Paul meets Christ. He said that he was disappointed because his Christ died on the cross and that was the one that he was preaching about.

I have a different more sinister view of Paul. His original plan for the destruction of the Church comes to fruition 2,100 years after his original mission. But not until after the Crusades, Papal indulgences, and pedophiles in the priesthood.

So, 2,100 years after Christ died. Women STILL can not be priests. That came from Pope "I have a spare drool bucket in my room", John Paul II, who said "b-b-b-b-b-b-b... no women as priests. Naptime." Face it folks, it's time for the man to retire. He is sick and major decisions have to be made. For God's sake the man probably went to school with President McKinley. It's time for "new" Catholic Church leadership.

How are we to take seriously a man who has dismissed the concept of not only breaking vows of chastity, but of human decency. He has condoned rape. What he has not condoned is SERIAL rape. Considering that priests are not supposed to have sex at all. I don't see why there is a problem with convicting a rapist.

We have allowed rapists in to the Catholic Church but not into our neighborhood without alerting the public as per Megan's Law. So, rape is bad - unless you are a priest and in that event don't get caught.

My really big question is: Why are there so many?

In 1990, Father Bruce Ritter was accused of sexual improprieties with some homeless young men under his care. For those of you who don't know who Father Bruce is, he founded Covenant House. Ever since that event, Father Bruce has been out of the spotlight.

Now, several years later, boys who have now reached adulthood are coming forth and telling their tales of being sexually abused by priests. Surely, they had to have seen this coming. But according to the Catholic Church - the attitude is so what? They are still priests and they are not in jail. The Catholic Church's only solution may be, "Why don't you do some missionary work in the Phillipines?" And the good father will disappear.

I hate to say this because it is right on the verge of blasphemy. But I've come so far already- why stop?

Jesus had said to Simon. "I call you Peter and upon this rock I shall build my Church."

I say now that if the Catholic Church kept a better mind on their own "peters" they wouldn't be in this mess to begin with. There has been a violation of trust in the relationship of the Catholic Church, the clergy, and the congregation. Sexual impropriety should not be an issue within the walls of the Church. Priests have had a calling to be spiritual leaders and now instead of children seeking a good example, they should be running in fear. I remember Church and Sunday School as a place to give us a good blueprint of right and wrong. How can we follow a religion that is teaching one thing and doing the exact opposite?

The church was built on Peter, but it looks now that the Catholic Church is "petering" out.

 

 

 
1